Contraction factor — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A factorisation kept past its date
One Cholesky factor can serve five members of a drifting sequence and save 44 per cent of the work. Kept for twenty it does not lose accuracy — it stops converging altogether. The optimum and the cliff are four members apart, both move with the drift, and a rule written in a ratio the iteration has already computed finds them without being told what the drift is.
The gap refinement can close
Multiplying by a computed inverse is not backward stable, and refinement at the working precision repairs it. That much is settled. The claim beside it — that the forward error does not move — was read at one conditioning and four corrections too late. Swept over ten, it moves at every one, and it lands on the LU route's own number after a single correction.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Backward errorCholesky factorisationChord methodCondition numberExact ground truthFlop countForward errorIterative refinementLinear convergenceMatrix inverseNewton iterationResidual