Fixed point iteration — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
An iteration that only multiplies
Newton's iteration for the polar factor needs an inverse every step. Newton–Schulz needs only matrix products — nothing that reads an entry, nothing that pivots — and it converges if and only if every singular value is below √3. At 1.73205 it converges and at 1.73206 it returns an orthogonal matrix that is not the answer, with a residual of 5·10⁻¹⁶ and nothing to say so.
Interpolating at the model’s own poles
One choice of interpolation points is not arbitrary — the mirrored poles of the model about to be built. It is a fixed point rather than a guess, and when it is reached it beats a method costing O(n³) — by 0.4 per cent, which is the honest size of the whole contest.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Flop countBalanced truncationCondition numberConvergence rateFixed pointH2 normHermite interpolationLyapunov equationMatrix-freeMoment matchingNewton iterationOptimality condition