Lattice — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A fraction recovered from one remainder
A solution over the rationals can be computed modulo a prime power and then recovered — the residue determines the fraction uniquely, but only once the modulus is twice the square of the fraction's longer part. Below that there is no partial credit: the algorithm returns a different fraction with the same residue, and it is a perfectly good one.
What a determinant does not determine
Two integer matrices can have the same determinant, the same rank and the same size, and define genuinely different maps. What separates them is a list of integers each dividing the next — computed here twice, once by unimodular elimination and once from the gcds of every minor, which share no algorithm at all.
A basis that describes its lattice badly
The same set of points has infinitely many bases, they are all correct, and they are not equally useful. One measurement separates them — the product of the vectors' lengths over the lattice determinant — and the determinant is the invariant the reduction may not change, which is what makes the reduction checkable.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Exact arithmeticDeterminantRational reconstructionUnimodularBit lengthChinese remainder theoremCramers ruleHermite normal formInvariant factorsLattice reductionModular arithmeticOrthogonality defect