LDLᵀ factorisation — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as symmetric indefinite — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
A factorisation with nothing to pivot for
Cholesky's growth factor is not bounded by one. It is equal to one, at every size and every condition number, and the two-line reason is why the algorithm needs no pivoting at all — not "usually gets away without it". Its only failure is the square root of a non-positive number, which is exactly the test for definiteness, and in floating point that test moves with the precision.
When symmetry is not enough
The matrix [[0, 1], [1, 0]] is symmetric, nonsingular and perfectly conditioned, and there is no diagonal entry to pivot on. Every factorisation restricted to symmetric interchanges and one-by-one pivots fails on it, at any depth of searching, because every entry it could search is zero. The repair is to take two variables at once.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
CholeskyGrowth factorPartial pivotingSymmetric indefiniteBunch–KaufmanComplete pivotingConstrained minimisationFactorisationGaussian eliminationPositive definiteSaddle-point systemsUnit roundoff