Moment matching — where it appears
Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as rational krylov — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
Exact at the points that were named
Balanced truncation asks for nothing and bounds everything, at a cost no large model can pay. The other kind of reduction asks for r numbers, costs r solves, is exact at every one of them — and bounds nothing anywhere else. That trade is the whole of large-scale model reduction.
A basis that is the same subspace and not the same thing
The interpolation conditions are conditions on a subspace, so any basis of it will do. The one a derivation writes down reaches a condition number of 7.7·10⁹ by its eighth vector, and the rate at which it gets there is set by a number the user chose with no information.
Interpolating at the model’s own poles
One choice of interpolation points is not arbitrary — the mirrored poles of the model about to be built. It is a fixed point rather than a guess, and when it is reached it beats a method costing O(n³) — by 0.4 per cent, which is the honest size of the whole contest.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Rational krylovBalanced truncationCondition numberFlop countHermite interpolationKrylov subspacePetrov–GalerkinTransfer functionA-priori boundBasisFixed point iterationH2 norm