Normalised laplacian — where it appears
Named by 5 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two Laplacians of one graph
D − A and D^{-1/2}(D − A)D^{-1/2} are built from the same object, are not similar to each other, and answer different questions. On a graph whose degrees are equal they coincide. On one whose degrees span an order of magnitude their second eigenvalues are sixteen times apart.
The vertex nobody solves for
A Laplacian is singular, so every solve with one has to remove its kernel first. There are three ways, they agree to fourteen digits, and the one everybody uses carries a free parameter that no account of the method mentions and that moves the condition number by nine hundred.
A bound with a square root in it
Cheeger's inequality brackets a graph's best cut between λ₂/2 and √(2λ₂). The lower bound is attained exactly. The upper one is loose by a factor of fourteen — on the one graph in the census with a real bottleneck, which is the shape it is always quoted about.
The rate is the second eigenvalue
A walk forgets where it started at a rate the graph's second eigenvalue names exactly. Across three orders of magnitude in the step count the prediction is five per cent high — and the published rate for PageRank is right for a reason nobody states, which is that a link graph is in pieces.
The spectrum is not the graph
Two graphs on six vertices with the same Laplacian characteristic polynomial — as integer polynomials, not to fourteen digits. One contains a triangle; the other is bipartite. Every method in this field that reads only the spectrum is answering about the class.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
ConductanceGraph laplacianAlgebraic connectivityBipartiteBound tightnessCharacteristic polynomialCheeger inequalityConditioningCospectral graphsDeflationDegree sequenceDiagonal scaling