Optimal complexity — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Where the format starts paying
A hierarchical solve costs 1.48 times a dense factorisation at 64 unknowns and 0.16 times it at 512. The crossover is between 64 and 128, it walks right when the accuracy is tightened, and the exponent between consecutive sizes is 2.13, 1.93, 1.74 — falling towards one and never arriving.
A rate that does not notice the size
The V-cycle reduces the residual by a factor of ten a cycle at fifteen points and at a hundred and twenty-seven. Jacobi on the same four problems goes from 0.981 to 0.9978, climbing towards one. One of those is a constant and the other is an exponent, and that is the whole distinction the field turns on.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Asymptotic analysisBackward errorBlock methodsConvergence factorData movementFlop countHierarchical matrixJacobi iterationLU factorisationTriangular solveThe V-cycleWoodbury identity