Generator

The error after 3 weighted Jacobi sweeps

One function in the multigrid library, called 6 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 4 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws the error after 3 weighted jacobi sweeps. Two curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.

error-after-smoothing is one function in lib/figures/multigrid.js — multigrid — the smoother, the coarse grid, and the rate that does not move. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

The error after 3 weighted Jacobi sweepsTwo curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.0816243240485664-1-0.500.51grid pointerror, as a fraction of its starting sizebeforeafteroscillatory energy, before0.82oscillatory energy, after0.02‖e‖ / ‖e₀‖0.57a smooth error is one a coarser grid can holdwhich is the whole of the idea

Two curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.

sweeps: 3

The arguments are the ones The error smoothing cannot reach passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

The error after 3 weighted Jacobi sweepsTwo curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.0816243240485664-1-0.500.51grid pointerror, as a fraction of its starting sizebeforeafteroscillatory energy, before0.82oscillatory energy, after0.02‖e‖ / ‖e₀‖0.57a smooth error is one a coarser grid can holdwhich is the whole of the idea

Two curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.

sweeps: 0

The arguments are the ones The same problem on a coarser grid passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

The error after 0 weighted Jacobi sweepsTwo curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.0816243240485664-1-0.500.51grid pointerror, as a fraction of its starting sizebeforeafteroscillatory energy, before0.82oscillatory energy, after0.82‖e‖ / ‖e₀‖1a smooth error is one a coarser grid can holdwhich is the whole of the idea

Two curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.

sweeps: 1

The arguments are the ones The same problem on a coarser grid passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

The error after 1 weighted Jacobi sweepTwo curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.0816243240485664-1-0.500.51grid pointerror, as a fraction of its starting sizebeforeafteroscillatory energy, before0.82oscillatory energy, after0.27‖e‖ / ‖e₀‖0.6a smooth error is one a coarser grid can holdwhich is the whole of the idea

Two curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.

sweeps: 2

The arguments are the ones The same problem on a coarser grid passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

The error after 2 weighted Jacobi sweepsTwo curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.0816243240485664-1-0.500.51grid pointerror, as a fraction of its starting sizebeforeafteroscillatory energy, before0.82oscillatory energy, after0.073‖e‖ / ‖e₀‖0.58a smooth error is one a coarser grid can holdwhich is the whole of the idea

Two curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.

sweeps: 4

The arguments are the ones The same problem on a coarser grid passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

The error after 4 weighted Jacobi sweepsTwo curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.0816243240485664-1-0.500.51grid pointerror, as a fraction of its starting sizebeforeafteroscillatory energy, before0.82oscillatory energy, after0.0053‖e‖ / ‖e₀‖0.57a smooth error is one a coarser grid can holdwhich is the whole of the idea

Two curves along the grid. The first is jagged; the second is a smooth wave of smaller amplitude with the jaggedness gone.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

4 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

after three sweeps most of the roughness is gone

and smoothing removes the oscillatory part first

the error starts mostly oscillatory

while shrinking the whole of it

Against the rule

The rule does not apply to it. It factorises nothing, so there is no residual it could be withholding. That is worth stating rather than leaving blank: a site that reported the rule as satisfied by every generator would be counting mostly generators the rule never reached.

Across the library: the rule bites on 217 of 397 generators — 199 print a residual and 18 are exempt with a published reason; 180 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail