Generator

gap-cost

One function in the restart library, called 4 times across 4 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 10 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws separating two eigenvalues, against how close they are. Iterations against the gap between the two largest eigenvalues, on a logarithmic gap axis. The single-vector method needs 17, 18, 20, 22 steps as the gap closes through four decades. The block of two needs 11 at every gap — and spends 22 products with A doing it, which is no less arithmetic. What it saves is synchronisations.

gap-cost is one function in lib/figures/restart.js — restarting and blocks — a filter on the starting vector, and what one vector cannot see. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

Separating two eigenvalues, against how close they areIterations against the gap between the two largest eigenvalues, on a logarithmic gap axis. The single-vector method needs 17, 18, 20, 22 steps as the gap closes through four decades. The block of two needs 11 at every gap — and spends 22 products with A doing it, which is no less arithmetic. What it saves is synchronisations.10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹0510152025gap between the two eigenvaluesiterationsone vectorblock iterationsblock productsiterations, not arithmeticsingle-vector steps at 0.117single-vector steps at 0.000122block iterations, every gap11the same products with Aand half the synchronisations

Iterations against the gap between the two largest eigenvalues, on a logarithmic gap axis. The single-vector method needs 17, 18, 20, 22 steps as the gap closes through four decades. The block of two needs 11 at every gap — and spends 22 products with A doing it, which is no less arithmetic. What it saves is synchronisations.

n: 24

The arguments are the ones A condition number for one eigenvalue passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

Separating two eigenvalues, against how close they areIterations against the gap between the two largest eigenvalues, on a logarithmic gap axis. The single-vector method needs 17, 18, 20, 22 steps as the gap closes through four decades. The block of two needs 11 at every gap — and spends 22 products with A doing it, which is no less arithmetic. What it saves is synchronisations.10⁻⁴10⁻³10⁻²10⁻¹0510152025gap between the two eigenvaluesiterationsone vectorblock iterationsblock productsiterations, not arithmeticsingle-vector steps at 0.117single-vector steps at 0.000122block iterations, every gap11the same products with Aand half the synchronisations

Iterations against the gap between the two largest eigenvalues, on a logarithmic gap axis. The single-vector method needs 17, 18, 20, 22 steps as the gap closes through four decades. The block of two needs 11 at every gap — and spends 22 products with A doing it, which is no less arithmetic. What it saves is synchronisations.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above asserted its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have failed the build rather than drawn a wrong picture. Those assertions used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

10 distinct claims across 2 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

both methods separate a gap of 0.1 — asserted 4 times

a size the search over step counts is affordable at

and the block's does not move

enough gaps to show a trend

Jacobi needs a symmetric matrix

matmul shapes agree

the single-vector iteration count grows as the gap closes

Against the rule

It draws a decomposition and prints its residual. It calls blockLanczos, and every figure above carries the badge — which residualcheck verifies by looking for it in the emitted SVG rather than by finding the call that builds one. A badge that is constructed and then left out of the body is the failure that check exists for.

Across the library: the rule bites on 66 of 131 generators — 51 print a residual and 15 are exempt with a published reason; 65 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail