grounding-choice

At its defaults it draws one system, 60 ways to remove its kernel, and 10.5× between them. A Laplacian is singular, so a solve has to remove its kernel, and the usual way is to delete one row and column — grounding a vertex, in the electrical reading. Which vertex is a free parameter that no account of the method mentions, and it is set by whichever index the code happens to drop. Every point here is one choice on the preferential 60: the condition number of the resulting positive definite matrix against the degree of the vertex removed. Grounding vertex 53, of degree 2, gives κ = 926.22; grounding vertex 3, of degree 17, gives 88.226 — a factor of 10.5 between two ways of solving the identical problem. The trend is that a high-degree vertex is the better ground, which has a reading: grounding a vertex fixes its potential, and fixing the potential of something the rest of the graph is strongly attached to constrains more of the graph.

grounding-choice is one function in lib/figures/graphlap.js — the matrix a graph makes — row sums that are exactly zero, a count that is a threshold, and a partition with no vector. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

A Laplacian is singular, so a solve has to remove its kernel, and the usual way is to delete one row and column — grounding a vertex, in the electrical reading. Which vertex is a free parameter that no account of the method mentions, and it is set by whichever index the code happens to drop. Every point here is one choice on the preferential 60: the condition number of the resulting positive definite matrix against the degree of the vertex removed. Grounding vertex 53, of degree 2, gives κ = 926.22; grounding vertex 3, of degree 17, gives 88.226 — a factor of 10.5 between two ways of solving the identical problem. The trend is that a high-degree vertex is the better ground, which has a reading: grounding a vertex fixes its potential, and fixing the potential of something the rest of the graph is strongly attached to constrains more of the graph.

A Laplacian is singular, so a solve has to remove its kernel, and the usual way is to delete one row and column — grounding a vertex, in the electrical reading. Which vertex is a free parameter that no account of the method mentions, and it is set by whichever index the code happens to drop. Every point here is one choice on the star 30: the condition number of the resulting positive definite matrix against the degree of the vertex removed. Grounding vertex 1, of degree 1, gives κ = 898; grounding vertex 0, of degree 29, gives 1 — a factor of 898 between two ways of solving the identical problem. The trend is that a high-degree vertex is the better ground, which has a reading: grounding a vertex fixes its potential, and fixing the potential of something the rest of the graph is strongly attached to constrains more of the graph.

A Laplacian is singular, so a solve has to remove its kernel, and the usual way is to delete one row and column — grounding a vertex, in the electrical reading. Which vertex is a free parameter that no account of the method mentions, and it is set by whichever index the code happens to drop. Every point here is one choice on the grid 6×6: the condition number of the resulting positive definite matrix against the degree of the vertex removed. Grounding vertex 5, of degree 2, gives κ = 275.34; grounding vertex 15, of degree 4, gives 96.565 — a factor of 2.851 between two ways of solving the identical problem. The trend is that a high-degree vertex is the better ground, which has a reading: grounding a vertex fixes its potential, and fixing the potential of something the rest of the graph is strongly attached to constrains more of the graph.

A Laplacian is singular, so a solve has to remove its kernel, and the usual way is to delete one row and column — grounding a vertex, in the electrical reading. Which vertex is a free parameter that no account of the method mentions, and it is set by whichever index the code happens to drop. Every point here is one choice on the barbell 10: the condition number of the resulting positive definite matrix against the degree of the vertex removed. Grounding vertex 11, of degree 9, gives κ = 153.78; grounding vertex 10, of degree 10, gives 118.99 — a factor of 1.292 between two ways of solving the identical problem. The trend is that a high-degree vertex is the better ground, which has a reading: grounding a vertex fixes its potential, and fixing the potential of something the rest of the graph is strongly attached to constrains more of the graph.

A Laplacian is singular, so a solve has to remove its kernel, and the usual way is to delete one row and column — grounding a vertex, in the electrical reading. Which vertex is a free parameter that no account of the method mentions, and it is set by whichever index the code happens to drop. Every point here is one choice on the preferential 60: the condition number of the resulting positive definite matrix against the degree of the vertex removed. Grounding vertex 53, of degree 2, gives κ = 926.22; grounding vertex 3, of degree 17, gives 88.226 — a factor of 10.5 between two ways of solving the identical problem. The trend is that a high-degree vertex is the better ground, which has a reading: grounding a vertex fixes its potential, and fixing the potential of something the rest of the graph is strongly attached to constrains more of the graph.

A Laplacian is singular, so a solve has to remove its kernel, and the usual way is to delete one row and column — grounding a vertex, in the electrical reading. Which vertex is a free parameter that no account of the method mentions, and it is set by whichever index the code happens to drop. Every point here is one choice on the path 30: the condition number of the resulting positive definite matrix against the degree of the vertex removed. Grounding vertex 0, of degree 1, gives κ = 1407.1; grounding vertex 14, of degree 2, gives 385.82 — a factor of 3.647 between two ways of solving the identical problem. The trend is that a high-degree vertex is the better ground, which has a reading: grounding a vertex fixes its potential, and fixing the potential of something the rest of the graph is strongly attached to constrains more of the graph.

Every figure above asserted its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have failed the build rather than drawn a wrong picture. Those assertions used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

10 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

The rule does not apply to it. It factorises nothing, so there is no residual it could be withholding. That is worth stating rather than leaving blank: a site that reported the rule as satisfied by every generator would be counting mostly generators the rule never reached.

Across the library: the rule bites on 214 of 382 generators — 194 print a residual and 20 are exempt with a published reason; 168 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.