Generator

Two Krylov methods against products with A, at a kernel shift of 1

One function in the lsqrgmres library, called 2 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 6 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws two krylov methods against products with a, at a kernel shift of 1. Two error curves against the number of products with A, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The Arnoldi method reaches 0.1532 after 4 products and is 9.18 by the end of the run. The bidiagonal method reaches 0.1367 after 42 and degrades far more slowly.

krylov-turn is one function in lib/figures/lsqrgmres.js — the other two krylov regularisers — one sequence, two recurrences, and a weight that stops being a function of σ. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

Two Krylov methods against products with A, at a kernel shift of 1Two error curves against the number of products with A, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The Arnoldi method reaches 0.1532 after 4 products and is 9.18 by the end of the run. The bidiagonal method reaches 0.1367 after 42 and degrades far more slowly.16111621263136414651566110⁻¹110¹products with Arelative errorArnoldi's best: 4Arnoldibidiagonalwhat a step buysArnoldi's best0.15products to reach it4bidiagonal's best0.14products to reach it42a tenth of the work to the same answerand no time at all spent there

Two error curves against the number of products with A, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The Arnoldi method reaches 0.1532 after 4 products and is 9.18 by the end of the run. The bidiagonal method reaches 0.1367 after 42 and degrades far more slowly.

shift: 1

The arguments are the ones An operator with no entries passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Two Krylov methods against products with A, at a kernel shift of 1Two error curves against the number of products with A, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The Arnoldi method reaches 0.1532 after 4 products and is 9.18 by the end of the run. The bidiagonal method reaches 0.1367 after 42 and degrades far more slowly.16111621263136414651566110⁻¹110¹products with Arelative errorArnoldi's best: 4Arnoldibidiagonalwhat a step buysArnoldi's best0.15products to reach it4bidiagonal's best0.14products to reach it42a tenth of the work to the same answerand no time at all spent there

Two error curves against the number of products with A, on a logarithmic vertical axis. The Arnoldi method reaches 0.1532 after 4 products and is 9.18 by the end of the run. The bidiagonal method reaches 0.1367 after 42 and degrades far more slowly.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

6 distinct claims across 2 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

a kernel shift the operator survives

a size the reference solve is affordable at

and in fewer steps

and leaves it far behind

enough steps for both methods to turn

the Arnoldi method reaches its best for fewer products

Against the rule

The rule does not apply to it. It factorises nothing, so there is no residual it could be withholding. That is worth stating rather than leaving blank: a site that reported the rule as satisfied by every generator would be counting mostly generators the rule never reached.

Across the library: the rule bites on 217 of 397 generators — 199 print a residual and 18 are exempt with a published reason; 180 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail