Generator

moment-conditioning

One function in the beyn library, called 8 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 8 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws what the higher moments cost, and the one division that removes it. The condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 6, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 1750, a factor of 1290 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.

moment-conditioning is one function in lib/figures/beyn.js — a ceiling with a knob on it — higher contour moments, and the conditioning that rises with them. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

What the higher moments cost, and the one division that removes itThe condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 6, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 1750, a factor of 1290 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.123456110²10⁴10⁶moments Kκ of the block Hankelintegrated in zin (z − c)/ρone division per pointradius6unscaled, K = 62.3·10⁶scaled, K = 61750the factor between1291the ceiling rises by Kand so did the conditioning

The condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 6, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 1750, a factor of 1290 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.

radius: 6

The arguments are the ones A ceiling with a knob on it passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

What the higher moments cost, and the one division that removes itThe condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 6, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 1750, a factor of 1290 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.123456110²10⁴10⁶moments Kκ of the block Hankelintegrated in zin (z − c)/ρone division per pointradius6unscaled, K = 62.3·10⁶scaled, K = 61750the factor between1291the ceiling rises by Kand so did the conditioning

The condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 6, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 1750, a factor of 1290 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.

radius: 3

The arguments are the ones The conditioning that rises with the ceiling passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

What the higher moments cost, and the one division that removes itThe condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 3, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 5.67 to 3071 across six moments. Scaled, it runs 5.67 to 12.2, a factor of 251 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.123456110²10⁴moments Kκ of the block Hankelintegrated in zin (z − c)/ρone division per pointradius3unscaled, K = 63071scaled, K = 612the factor between251the ceiling rises by Kand so did the conditioning

The condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 3, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 5.67 to 3071 across six moments. Scaled, it runs 5.67 to 12.2, a factor of 251 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.

radius: 5

The arguments are the ones The conditioning that rises with the ceiling passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

What the higher moments cost, and the one division that removes itThe condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 5, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 695, a factor of 3250 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.123456110²10⁴10⁶moments Kκ of the block Hankelintegrated in zin (z − c)/ρone division per pointradius5unscaled, K = 62.3·10⁶scaled, K = 6695the factor between3251the ceiling rises by Kand so did the conditioning

The condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 5, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 695, a factor of 3250 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.

radius: 10

The arguments are the ones The conditioning that rises with the ceiling passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

What the higher moments cost, and the one division that removes itThe condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 10, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 3.37·10⁴, a factor of 67.1 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.123456110²10⁴10⁶moments Kκ of the block Hankelintegrated in zin (z − c)/ρone division per pointradius10unscaled, K = 62.3·10⁶scaled, K = 63.4·10⁴the factor between67the ceiling rises by Kand so did the conditioning

The condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 10, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.28 to 2.26·10⁶ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.28 to 3.37·10⁴, a factor of 67.1 better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.

radius: 15

The arguments are the ones The conditioning that rises with the ceiling passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

What the higher moments cost, and the one division that removes itThe condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 15, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.22 to 7.37·10⁸ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.22 to 3952, a factor of 1.9·10⁵ better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.123456110²10⁴10⁶10⁸moments Kκ of the block Hankelintegrated in zin (z − c)/ρone division per pointradius15unscaled, K = 67.4·10⁸scaled, K = 63952the factor between1.9·10⁵the ceiling rises by Kand so did the conditioning

The condition number of the block Hankel against K, on a contour of radius 15, integrating in z and in the scaled variable (z − c)/ρ. Unscaled, ‖Aₚ‖ grows like ρᵖ, so the block Hankel of K moments is graded over ρ²ᴷ and its condition number rises at exactly the rate the ceiling does — from 1.22 to 7.37·10⁸ across six moments. Scaled, it runs 1.22 to 3952, a factor of 1.9·10⁵ better at the far end. The scaled variable is on the unit circle, so every moment is the same size; the cost is one division per quadrature point and the eigenvalues come back with c + ρ× applied.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above asserted its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have failed the build rather than drawn a wrong picture. Those assertions used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

8 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

a contour the closed form covers

a division by a complex number that is not zero

a Lambert argument that is not zero

a size the contour integrals can afford

and the gap grows with the number of moments

enough moments for the block asked for

LU is for square matrices

the unscaled block Hankel is worse conditioned

Against the rule

It draws a decomposition and prints its residual. It calls contourMoments, momentRank, and every figure above carries the badge — which residualcheck verifies by looking for it in the emitted SVG rather than by finding the call that builds one. A badge that is constructed and then left out of the body is the failure that check exists for.

Across the library: the rule bites on 192 of 346 generators — 174 print a residual and 18 are exempt with a published reason; 154 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail