Generator

The reduced Hessian and the answer, against how badly the basic columns were chosen

One function in the nullbasis library, called 2 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 10 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws the reduced hessian and the answer, against how badly the basic columns were chosen. γ is the condition number of the first 4 columns of A, and the naive rule calls exactly those columns basic. Its reduced Hessian's condition number climbs from 83.77 to 4.871·10¹⁸ across ten decades of γ — the square, because κ(ZᵀHZ) ≤ κ(H)κ(Z)² and the bound is attained. Choosing the basic columns by a column-pivoted QR instead holds it between 31.72 and 43.09 at every stop. The two forward errors, measured against a BigInt answer, follow their own condition numbers: 0.3173 against 8.07·10⁻¹⁶ at γ = 10¹⁰. κ(A) is 10⁶ throughout and never moves — nothing about the problem's difficulty changes across this axis, only which columns a one-line rule happens to pick.

null-basis-sweep is one function in lib/figures/nullbasis.js — the basis of a constraint — three spans of one null space, and the square between them. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

The reduced Hessian and the answer, against how badly the basic columns were chosenγ is the condition number of the first 4 columns of A, and the naive rule calls exactly those columns basic. Its reduced Hessian's condition number climbs from 83.77 to 4.871·10¹⁸ across ten decades of γ — the square, because κ(ZᵀHZ) ≤ κ(H)κ(Z)² and the bound is attained. Choosing the basic columns by a column-pivoted QR instead holds it between 31.72 and 43.09 at every stop. The two forward errors, measured against a BigInt answer, follow their own condition numbers: 0.3173 against 8.07·10⁻¹⁶ at γ = 10¹⁰. κ(A) is 10⁶ throughout and never moves — nothing about the problem's difficulty changes across this axis, only which columns a one-line rule happens to pick.024681010⁻¹⁷10⁻¹³10⁻⁹10⁻⁵10⁻¹10³10⁷10¹¹10¹⁵10¹⁹log₁₀ γ — conditioning of the first m columnscondition number, and relative errorκ(ZᵀHZ), naiveκ(ZᵀHZ), pivotederror, naiveerror, orthonormalone problem, two rulesκ(ZᵀHZ) naive, γ = 10¹⁰4.9·10¹⁸κ(ZᵀHZ) pivoted, worst43error, naive0.32error, pivoted8.1·10⁻¹⁶κ(A) does not move across this axisand the answer moves by fourteen digits

γ is the condition number of the first 4 columns of A, and the naive rule calls exactly those columns basic. Its reduced Hessian's condition number climbs from 83.77 to 4.871·10¹⁸ across ten decades of γ — the square, because κ(ZᵀHZ) ≤ κ(H)κ(Z)² and the bound is attained. Choosing the basic columns by a column-pivoted QR instead holds it between 31.72 and 43.09 at every stop. The two forward errors, measured against a BigInt answer, follow their own condition numbers: 0.3173 against 8.07·10⁻¹⁶ at γ = 10¹⁰. κ(A) is 10⁶ throughout and never moves — nothing about the problem's difficulty changes across this axis, only which columns a one-line rule happens to pick.

m: 4

The arguments are the ones The basis nobody chose on purpose passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

The reduced Hessian and the answer, against how badly the basic columns were chosenγ is the condition number of the first 4 columns of A, and the naive rule calls exactly those columns basic. Its reduced Hessian's condition number climbs from 83.77 to 4.871·10¹⁸ across ten decades of γ — the square, because κ(ZᵀHZ) ≤ κ(H)κ(Z)² and the bound is attained. Choosing the basic columns by a column-pivoted QR instead holds it between 31.72 and 43.09 at every stop. The two forward errors, measured against a BigInt answer, follow their own condition numbers: 0.3173 against 8.07·10⁻¹⁶ at γ = 10¹⁰. κ(A) is 10⁶ throughout and never moves — nothing about the problem's difficulty changes across this axis, only which columns a one-line rule happens to pick.024681010⁻¹⁷10⁻¹³10⁻⁹10⁻⁵10⁻¹10³10⁷10¹¹10¹⁵10¹⁹log₁₀ γ — conditioning of the first m columnscondition number, and relative errorκ(ZᵀHZ), naiveκ(ZᵀHZ), pivotederror, naiveerror, orthonormalone problem, two rulesκ(ZᵀHZ) naive, γ = 10¹⁰4.9·10¹⁸κ(ZᵀHZ) pivoted, worst43error, naive0.32error, pivoted8.1·10⁻¹⁶κ(A) does not move across this axisand the answer moves by fourteen digits

γ is the condition number of the first 4 columns of A, and the naive rule calls exactly those columns basic. Its reduced Hessian's condition number climbs from 83.77 to 4.871·10¹⁸ across ten decades of γ — the square, because κ(ZᵀHZ) ≤ κ(H)κ(Z)² and the bound is attained. Choosing the basic columns by a column-pivoted QR instead holds it between 31.72 and 43.09 at every stop. The two forward errors, measured against a BigInt answer, follow their own condition numbers: 0.3173 against 8.07·10⁻¹⁶ at γ = 10¹⁰. κ(A) is 10⁶ throughout and never moves — nothing about the problem's difficulty changes across this axis, only which columns a one-line rule happens to pick.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

10 distinct claims across 2 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

a basis rule this file implements

a constraint no larger than the problem

a finite double, since an infinity is not a rational

a problem the exact solve can afford at every stop

and the pivoted one does not rise

fewer constraints than unknowns

fewer constraints than unknowns, so something is left to minimise

LU is for square matrices

matmul shapes agree

the naive reduced Hessian rises with γ²

Against the rule

It draws a decomposition and prints its residual. It calls basisComparison, and every figure above carries the badge — which residualcheck verifies by looking for it in the emitted SVG rather than by finding the call that builds one. A badge that is constructed and then left out of the body is the failure that check exists for.

Across the library: the rule bites on 217 of 397 generators — 199 print a residual and 18 are exempt with a published reason; 180 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail