Generator

Where the missing eigenvalues went: an 6 × 6 quadratic with 1 of its masses removed

One function in the quadratic library, called 7 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 8 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws where the missing eigenvalues went: an 6 × 6 quadratic with 1 of its masses removed. A chain of 6 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 5. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 12; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 13 nodes it has degree 11, so 1 of the 12 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.

qep-count is one function in lib/figures/quadratic.js — a matrix that depends on its own eigenvalue — 2n answers for n rows, and a count that is a degree. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

Where the missing eigenvalues went: an 6 × 6 quadratic with 1 of its masses removedA chain of 6 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 5. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 12; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 13 nodes it has degree 11, so 1 of the 12 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.finite eigenvalues (degree of det Q)11at infinity (2n − degree)1at infinity, by the rank of M12n, if M were nonsingular12a degree, not a decisiondegree of det Q11at infinity1by the rank of M1singular-value gap∞the count is a degreeand the other route is a judgement

A chain of 6 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 5. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 12; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 13 nodes it has degree 11, so 1 of the 12 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.

k: 1

The arguments are the ones A matrix that depends on its own eigenvalue passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Where the missing eigenvalues went: an 6 × 6 quadratic with 1 of its masses removedA chain of 6 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 5. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 12; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 13 nodes it has degree 11, so 1 of the 12 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.finite eigenvalues (degree of det Q)11at infinity (2n − degree)1at infinity, by the rank of M12n, if M were nonsingular12a degree, not a decisiondegree of det Q11at infinity1by the rank of M1singular-value gap∞the count is a degreeand the other route is a judgement

A chain of 6 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 5. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 12; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 13 nodes it has degree 11, so 1 of the 12 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.

n: 7, k: 1

The arguments are the ones One mass removed, and one eigenvalue gone passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Where the missing eigenvalues went: an 7 × 7 quadratic with 1 of its masses removedA chain of 7 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 6. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 14; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 15 nodes it has degree 13, so 1 of the 14 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.finite eigenvalues (degree of det Q)13at infinity (2n − degree)1at infinity, by the rank of M12n, if M were nonsingular14a degree, not a decisiondegree of det Q13at infinity1by the rank of M1singular-value gap∞the count is a degreeand the other route is a judgement

A chain of 7 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 6. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 14; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 15 nodes it has degree 13, so 1 of the 14 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.

n: 8, k: 1

The arguments are the ones One mass removed, and one eigenvalue gone passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Where the missing eigenvalues went: an 8 × 8 quadratic with 1 of its masses removedA chain of 8 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 7. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 16; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 17 nodes it has degree 15, so 1 of the 16 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.finite eigenvalues (degree of det Q)15at infinity (2n − degree)1at infinity, by the rank of M12n, if M were nonsingular16a degree, not a decisiondegree of det Q15at infinity1by the rank of M1singular-value gap∞the count is a degreeand the other route is a judgement

A chain of 8 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 7. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 16; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 17 nodes it has degree 15, so 1 of the 16 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.

n: 3, k: 1

The arguments are the ones One mass removed, and one eigenvalue gone passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Where the missing eigenvalues went: an 3 × 3 quadratic with 1 of its masses removedA chain of 3 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 2. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 6; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 7 nodes it has degree 5, so 1 of the 6 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.finite eigenvalues (degree of det Q)5at infinity (2n − degree)1at infinity, by the rank of M12n, if M were nonsingular6a degree, not a decisiondegree of det Q5at infinity1by the rank of M1singular-value gap∞the count is a degreeand the other route is a judgement

A chain of 3 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 2. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 6; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 7 nodes it has degree 5, so 1 of the 6 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.

n: 4, k: 1

The arguments are the ones One mass removed, and one eigenvalue gone passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Where the missing eigenvalues went: an 4 × 4 quadratic with 1 of its masses removedA chain of 4 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 3. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 8; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 9 nodes it has degree 7, so 1 of the 8 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.finite eigenvalues (degree of det Q)7at infinity (2n − degree)1at infinity, by the rank of M12n, if M were nonsingular8a degree, not a decisiondegree of det Q7at infinity1by the rank of M1singular-value gap∞the count is a degreeand the other route is a judgement

A chain of 4 masses with the first 1 of them set to zero, so M is singular of rank 3. det Q(λ) is a polynomial of degree at most 8; interpolated exactly in BigInt rationals at 9 nodes it has degree 7, so 1 of the 8 eigenvalues are at infinity — the same object a descriptor pencil has, arriving here because a degree of freedom with no inertia is an algebraic constraint. The float route counts the singular values of M judged to be zero and reaches 1, backed by a gap of ∞ between consecutive singular values. One integer, two routes, and only the second of them is a decision.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

8 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

a chain long enough to have a spectrum and short enough to draw

a positive mass

a size the exact interpolation can afford

an integer entry, which is what makes the exact route exact

and the rank decision agrees

damping that removes energy rather than adding it

some masses missing and some left

the degree is short by the number of missing masses

Against the rule

It draws a decomposition and prints its residual. It calls charPolyQuadExact, and every figure above carries the badge — which residualcheck verifies by looking for it in the emitted SVG rather than by finding the call that builds one. A badge that is constructed and then left out of the body is the failure that check exists for.

Across the library: the rule bites on 217 of 397 generators — 199 print a residual and 18 are exempt with a published reason; 180 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail