Generator

Past the cliff: what each method returns

One function in the parallel library, called 7 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 15 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws past the cliff: what each method returns. Loss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.

refuse-or-lie is one function in lib/figures/parallel.js — messages — the count words cannot make, and what the fewest of them costs. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

Past the cliff: what each method returnsLoss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.‖QᵀQ − I‖ of the implied Qκ = 10⁸, Cholesky0.37κ = 10⁸, sweep8.5·10⁻⁹κ = 10¹⁰, Cholesky1.3κ = 10¹⁰, sweep3·10⁻⁷κ = 3·10¹⁰, Choleskyrefusedκ = 3·10¹⁰, sweep6.7·10⁻⁶κ = 10¹², Cholesky1.5κ = 10¹², sweep1.4·10⁻⁴the safe run is the one that failsrefusals in the range1wholly non-orthogonal returns2the pivot it refused on-6.5·10⁻¹⁷one of these outcomes is safeand it is the refusal

Loss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.

n: 8

The arguments are the ones Deciding that a zero has arrived passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Past the cliff: what each method returnsLoss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.‖QᵀQ − I‖ of the implied Qκ = 10⁸, Cholesky0.37κ = 10⁸, sweep8.5·10⁻⁹κ = 10¹⁰, Cholesky1.3κ = 10¹⁰, sweep3·10⁻⁷κ = 3·10¹⁰, Choleskyrefusedκ = 3·10¹⁰, sweep6.7·10⁻⁶κ = 10¹², Cholesky1.5κ = 10¹², sweep1.4·10⁻⁴the safe run is the one that failsrefusals in the range1wholly non-orthogonal returns2the pivot it refused on-6.5·10⁻¹⁷one of these outcomes is safeand it is the refusal

Loss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.

kappas: [100000000, 10000000000, 30000000000, 1000000000000]

The arguments are the ones The licence is not the boundary passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Past the cliff: what each method returnsLoss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.‖QᵀQ − I‖ of the implied Qκ = 10⁸, Cholesky0.37κ = 10⁸, sweep8.5·10⁻⁹κ = 10¹⁰, Cholesky1.3κ = 10¹⁰, sweep3·10⁻⁷κ = 3·10¹⁰, Choleskyrefusedκ = 3·10¹⁰, sweep6.7·10⁻⁶κ = 10¹², Cholesky1.5κ = 10¹², sweep1.4·10⁻⁴the safe run is the one that failsrefusals in the range1wholly non-orthogonal returns2the pivot it refused on-6.5·10⁻¹⁷one of these outcomes is safeand it is the refusal

Loss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.

kappas: [100000000, 20000000000, 40000000000, 1000000000000]

The arguments are the ones The licence is not the boundary passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Past the cliff: what each method returnsLoss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at two of them — 2·10¹⁰, 4·10¹⁰ — it refuses outright, the first on a pivot of -2.7·10⁻¹⁶. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.‖QᵀQ − I‖ of the implied Qκ = 10⁸, Cholesky0.37κ = 10⁸, sweep8.5·10⁻⁹κ = 2·10¹⁰, Choleskyrefusedκ = 2·10¹⁰, sweep2.3·10⁻⁶κ = 4·10¹⁰, Choleskyrefusedκ = 4·10¹⁰, sweep2.9·10⁻⁶κ = 10¹², Cholesky1.5κ = 10¹², sweep1.4·10⁻⁴the safe run is the one that failsrefusals in the range2wholly non-orthogonal returns1the pivot it refused on-2.7·10⁻¹⁶one of these outcomes is safeand it is the refusal

Loss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at two of them — 2·10¹⁰, 4·10¹⁰ — it refuses outright, the first on a pivot of -2.7·10⁻¹⁶. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.

kappas: [100000000, 30000000000, 300000000000, 1000000000000]

The arguments are the ones The licence is not the boundary passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Past the cliff: what each method returnsLoss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.‖QᵀQ − I‖ of the implied Qκ = 10⁸, Cholesky0.37κ = 10⁸, sweep8.5·10⁻⁹κ = 3·10¹⁰, Choleskyrefusedκ = 3·10¹⁰, sweep6.7·10⁻⁶κ = 3·10¹¹, Cholesky1.6κ = 3·10¹¹, sweep3.5·10⁻⁵κ = 10¹², Cholesky1.5κ = 10¹², sweep1.4·10⁻⁴the safe run is the one that failsrefusals in the range1wholly non-orthogonal returns2the pivot it refused on-6.5·10⁻¹⁷one of these outcomes is safeand it is the refusal

Loss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.37 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹² — and at 3·10¹⁰ it refuses outright, on a pivot of -6.5·10⁻¹⁷. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.

n: 6, kappas: [100000000, 10000000000, 1000000000000, 10000000000000]

The arguments are the ones The licence is not the boundary passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

Past the cliff: what each method returnsLoss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.17 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹³ — and at two of them — 10¹⁰, 10¹² — it refuses outright, the first on a pivot of -3.6·10⁻¹⁵. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.‖QᵀQ − I‖ of the implied Qκ = 10⁸, Cholesky0.17κ = 10⁸, sweep4.9·10⁻⁹κ = 10¹⁰, Choleskyrefusedκ = 10¹⁰, sweep6.8·10⁻⁷κ = 10¹², Choleskyrefusedκ = 10¹², sweep9.1·10⁻⁵κ = 10¹³, Cholesky1.5κ = 10¹³, sweep2.2·10⁻⁴the safe run is the one that failsrefusals in the range2wholly non-orthogonal returns1the pivot it refused on-3.6·10⁻¹⁵one of these outcomes is safeand it is the refusal

Loss of orthogonality at four condition numbers past κ²u = 1. Cholesky QR returns a factor whose implied Q is 0.17 away from orthogonal at κ = 10⁸ and 1.49 at 10¹³ — and at two of them — 10¹⁰, 10¹² — it refuses outright, the first on a pivot of -3.6·10⁻¹⁵. The sweep and the tree return a usable factorisation of every one of these matrices.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

15 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

the sweep still returns something usable at κ = 3·10¹⁰ — checked 3 times

a matrix tall enough for the slices to be tall

and it succeeds on a harder matrix than one it declined

and returns a wholly non-orthogonal factor somewhere else in it

Cholesky QR refuses somewhere in this range

condition numbers past where κ²u passes one

each row block is at least as tall as it is wide

matmul shapes agree

the sweep still returns something usable at κ = 10¹⁰

the sweep still returns something usable at κ = 10¹²

the sweep still returns something usable at κ = 10¹³

the sweep still returns something usable at κ = 10⁸

the sweep still returns something usable at κ = 3·10¹¹

Against the rule

It draws a decomposition and prints its residual. It calls choleskyQR, tsqrDistributed, householderDistributed, and every figure above carries the badge — which residualcheck verifies by looking for it in the emitted SVG rather than by finding the call that builds one. A badge that is constructed and then left out of the body is the failure that check exists for.

Across the library: the rule bites on 217 of 397 generators — 199 print a residual and 18 are exempt with a published reason; 180 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail