Generator

reorth-cost

One function in the lanczos library, called 2 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 8 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws what each reorthogonalisation costs and what it leaves, n = 40. Two quantities for three variants on one logarithmic axis: the number of projections performed, and the departure from orthogonality left behind. Doing nothing costs nothing and leaves a basis that is not one. Full reorthogonalisation costs 820 projections and leaves 1.9·10⁻¹⁵. Selective costs 137 — 6.0 times fewer — and leaves 10·10⁻⁸, which is √u and is enough.

reorth-cost is one function in lib/figures/lanczos.js — lanczos — three terms, lost orthogonality, and an eigenvalue that arrives twice. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

What each reorthogonalisation costs and what it leaves, n = 40Two quantities for three variants on one logarithmic axis: the number of projections performed, and the departure from orthogonality left behind. Doing nothing costs nothing and leaves a basis that is not one. Full reorthogonalisation costs 820 projections and leaves 1.9·10⁻¹⁵. Selective costs 137 — 6.0 times fewer — and leaves 10·10⁻⁸, which is √u and is enough.010⁻¹⁷10⁻¹⁴10⁻¹¹10⁻⁸10⁻⁵10⁻²10¹count, and ‖QᵀQ − I‖√u — semi-orthogonalitynoneselectivefullprojections‖QᵀQ − I‖two counters, three methodsghosts, none4ghosts, selective0selective is cheaper by6the cheap repair leaves a basis that is not orthogonaland that is the claim, not a shortfall

Two quantities for three variants on one logarithmic axis: the number of projections performed, and the departure from orthogonality left behind. Doing nothing costs nothing and leaves a basis that is not one. Full reorthogonalisation costs 820 projections and leaves 1.9·10⁻¹⁵. Selective costs 137 — 6.0 times fewer — and leaves 10·10⁻⁸, which is √u and is enough.

n: 40

The arguments are the ones An eigenvalue that arrives twice passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.

What each reorthogonalisation costs and what it leaves, n = 40Two quantities for three variants on one logarithmic axis: the number of projections performed, and the departure from orthogonality left behind. Doing nothing costs nothing and leaves a basis that is not one. Full reorthogonalisation costs 820 projections and leaves 1.9·10⁻¹⁵. Selective costs 137 — 6.0 times fewer — and leaves 10·10⁻⁸, which is √u and is enough.010⁻¹⁷10⁻¹⁴10⁻¹¹10⁻⁸10⁻⁵10⁻²10¹count, and ‖QᵀQ − I‖√u — semi-orthogonalitynoneselectivefullprojections‖QᵀQ − I‖two counters, three methodsghosts, none4ghosts, selective0selective is cheaper by6the cheap repair leaves a basis that is not orthogonaland that is the claim, not a shortfall

Two quantities for three variants on one logarithmic axis: the number of projections performed, and the departure from orthogonality left behind. Doing nothing costs nothing and leaves a basis that is not one. Full reorthogonalisation costs 820 projections and leaves 1.9·10⁻¹⁵. Selective costs 137 — 6.0 times fewer — and leaves 10·10⁻⁸, which is √u and is enough.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above asserted its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have failed the build rather than drawn a wrong picture. Those assertions used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

8 distinct claims across 2 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

a size the ghosts appear at within n steps

and both repairs remove them

at the threshold it was aimed at

for a fraction of the projections

Jacobi needs a symmetric matrix

leaving a basis that is only semi-orthogonal

matmul shapes agree

the plain run has ghosts

Against the rule

It draws a decomposition and prints its residual. It calls lanczos, and every figure above carries the badge — which residualcheck verifies by looking for it in the emitted SVG rather than by finding the call that builds one. A badge that is constructed and then left out of the body is the failure that check exists for.

Across the library: the rule bites on 52 of 99 generators — 37 print a residual and 15 are exempt with a published reason; 47 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail