What two lines of scaling are worth: the same quadratic in nine systems of units
At its defaults it draws what two lines of scaling are worth: the same quadratic in nine systems of units. The forward error against the closed form for an overdamped chain of 8 masses, before and after Fan–Lin–Van Dooren scaling. The unscaled curve runs 8.36·10⁻¹⁴ to 0.001258 — every digit gone by the far end — and the scaled one runs 1.34·10⁻¹³ to 9.09·10⁻¹⁴, flat to within a factor of 1.91. The scaling is γ, the square root of ‖K‖ over ‖M‖, and δ, two over the sum of ‖K‖ and γ‖C‖, computed from three norms and nothing else, and the map back is λ = γμ with no rounding in the statement. Flatness is the half that matters: after scaling every stop of the sweep IS the same problem, so there is nothing left for the change of units to do.
scaling-recovery is one function in lib/figures/qepscale.js —
the units a polynomial is written in — two lines of scaling, a prediction that is half right, and a format's edge. Everything below came out of it during this build, at
arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the
figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.
At its defaults
Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.
The forward error against the closed form for an overdamped chain of 8 masses, before and after Fan–Lin–Van Dooren scaling. The unscaled curve runs 8.36·10⁻¹⁴ to 0.001258 — every digit gone by the far end — and the scaled one runs 1.34·10⁻¹³ to 9.09·10⁻¹⁴, flat to within a factor of 1.91. The scaling is γ, the square root of ‖K‖ over ‖M‖, and δ, two over the sum of ‖K‖ and γ‖C‖, computed from three norms and nothing else, and the map back is λ = γμ with no rounding in the statement. Flatness is the half that matters: after scaling every stop of the sweep IS the same problem, so there is nothing left for the change of units to do.
n: 8
The arguments are the ones The scaling that buys ten orders passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
The forward error against the closed form for an overdamped chain of 8 masses, before and after Fan–Lin–Van Dooren scaling. The unscaled curve runs 8.36·10⁻¹⁴ to 0.001258 — every digit gone by the far end — and the scaled one runs 1.34·10⁻¹³ to 9.09·10⁻¹⁴, flat to within a factor of 1.91. The scaling is γ, the square root of ‖K‖ over ‖M‖, and δ, two over the sum of ‖K‖ and γ‖C‖, computed from three norms and nothing else, and the map back is λ = γμ with no rounding in the statement. Flatness is the half that matters: after scaling every stop of the sweep IS the same problem, so there is nothing left for the change of units to do.
n: 4
The arguments are the ones The scaling that buys ten orders passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
The forward error against the closed form for an overdamped chain of 4 masses, before and after Fan–Lin–Van Dooren scaling. The unscaled curve runs 5.12·10⁻¹⁵ to 4.331·10⁻⁴ — every digit gone by the far end — and the scaled one runs 9.55·10⁻¹⁵ to 6.65·10⁻¹⁵, flat to within a factor of 3.21. The scaling is γ, the square root of ‖K‖ over ‖M‖, and δ, two over the sum of ‖K‖ and γ‖C‖, computed from three norms and nothing else, and the map back is λ = γμ with no rounding in the statement. Flatness is the half that matters: after scaling every stop of the sweep IS the same problem, so there is nothing left for the change of units to do.
n: 6
The arguments are the ones The scaling that buys ten orders passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
The forward error against the closed form for an overdamped chain of 6 masses, before and after Fan–Lin–Van Dooren scaling. The unscaled curve runs 8.71·10⁻¹⁵ to 0.006738 — every digit gone by the far end — and the scaled one runs 2.54·10⁻¹⁴ to 1.07·10⁻¹⁴, flat to within a factor of 7.25. The scaling is γ, the square root of ‖K‖ over ‖M‖, and δ, two over the sum of ‖K‖ and γ‖C‖, computed from three norms and nothing else, and the map back is λ = γμ with no rounding in the statement. Flatness is the half that matters: after scaling every stop of the sweep IS the same problem, so there is nothing left for the change of units to do.
n: 10
The arguments are the ones The scaling that buys ten orders passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
The forward error against the closed form for an overdamped chain of 10 masses, before and after Fan–Lin–Van Dooren scaling. The unscaled curve runs 2.96·10⁻¹³ to 0.07412 — every digit gone by the far end — and the scaled one runs 7.53·10⁻¹⁴ to 1.28·10⁻¹⁴, flat to within a factor of 16.1. The scaling is γ, the square root of ‖K‖ over ‖M‖, and δ, two over the sum of ‖K‖ and γ‖C‖, computed from three norms and nothing else, and the map back is λ = γμ with no rounding in the statement. Flatness is the half that matters: after scaling every stop of the sweep IS the same problem, so there is nothing left for the change of units to do.
n: 12
The arguments are the ones The scaling that buys ten orders passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
The forward error against the closed form for an overdamped chain of 12 masses, before and after Fan–Lin–Van Dooren scaling. The unscaled curve runs 2.61·10⁻¹⁴ to 0.3958 — every digit gone by the far end — and the scaled one runs 1.15·10⁻¹³ to 4.13·10⁻¹⁴, flat to within a factor of 6.31. The scaling is γ, the square root of ‖K‖ over ‖M‖, and δ, two over the sum of ‖K‖ and γ‖C‖, computed from three norms and nothing else, and the map back is λ = γμ with no rounding in the statement. Flatness is the half that matters: after scaling every stop of the sweep IS the same problem, so there is nothing left for the change of units to do.
What it checked while drawing
Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed
would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave
no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had
checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected
by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of
what it is believed to check.
17 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.
a chain long enough to have a spectrum and short enough to draw
a linearisation has as many eigenvalues as it has rows
a positive change of units
a positive mass
a quadratic with both outer coefficients present
a reduction this file knows
a size the sweep can afford
an inverse iterate that is a vector
an overdamped chain, whose spectrum is entirely real
and the scaled one does not
damping that removes energy rather than adding it
every computed eigenvalue is matched to an unused exact one
LU is for square matrices
matmul shapes agree
some real eigenpair to measure
the unscaled error grows across the sweep
two spectra of the same size
Against the rule
The rule does not apply to it. It factorises nothing, so there is no residual it could be withholding. That is worth stating rather than leaving blank: a site that reported the rule as satisfied by every generator would be counting mostly generators the rule never reached.
Across the library: the rule bites on 217
of 397 generators —
199 print a residual and
18 are exempt with a published reason;
180 factorise nothing.
Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from,
and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.