How nearly the constraint is satisfied, when a sketch is allowed to see it and when it is not
At its defaults it draws how nearly the constraint is satisfied, when a sketch is allowed to see it and when it is not. Sketching reduces a least-squares problem to 8 rows and keeps its minimiser within (1 + ε) of the original's. That is a statement about a norm, and an equality constraint is a statement that a quantity is zero, which no multiplicative distortion preserves. Kept out of the sketch and imposed exactly, the constraint holds to 1.68·10⁻¹⁶ at every weight. Written as a weight and sketched along with everything else, it holds at 1.747·10⁻⁸ at τ = 10⁸ — and the slope is the finding: the violation falls as 1/τ, one power, where the unsketched weighted problem's falls as 1/τ². The sketch costs exactly half the decades the weight was buying, and buying them back means squaring τ, which the previous figure says the arithmetic stops allowing.
sketch-feasibility is one function in lib/figures/lse.js —
a constraint as a weight — the limit, the ceiling that belongs to the solver, and the order of the rows. Everything below came out of it during this build, at
arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the
figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.
At its defaults
Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.
Sketching reduces a least-squares problem to 8 rows and keeps its minimiser within (1 + ε) of the original's. That is a statement about a norm, and an equality constraint is a statement that a quantity is zero, which no multiplicative distortion preserves. Kept out of the sketch and imposed exactly, the constraint holds to 1.68·10⁻¹⁶ at every weight. Written as a weight and sketched along with everything else, it holds at 1.747·10⁻⁸ at τ = 10⁸ — and the slope is the finding: the violation falls as 1/τ, one power, where the unsketched weighted problem's falls as 1/τ². The sketch costs exactly half the decades the weight was buying, and buying them back means squaring τ, which the previous figure says the arithmetic stops allowing.
l: 8
The arguments are the ones The half of a problem a sketch may touch passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
Sketching reduces a least-squares problem to 8 rows and keeps its minimiser within (1 + ε) of the original's. That is a statement about a norm, and an equality constraint is a statement that a quantity is zero, which no multiplicative distortion preserves. Kept out of the sketch and imposed exactly, the constraint holds to 1.68·10⁻¹⁶ at every weight. Written as a weight and sketched along with everything else, it holds at 1.747·10⁻⁸ at τ = 10⁸ — and the slope is the finding: the violation falls as 1/τ, one power, where the unsketched weighted problem's falls as 1/τ². The sketch costs exactly half the decades the weight was buying, and buying them back means squaring τ, which the previous figure says the arithmetic stops allowing.
l: 24
The arguments are the ones The half of a problem a sketch may touch passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
Sketching reduces a least-squares problem to 24 rows and keeps its minimiser within (1 + ε) of the original's. That is a statement about a norm, and an equality constraint is a statement that a quantity is zero, which no multiplicative distortion preserves. Kept out of the sketch and imposed exactly, the constraint holds to 1.19·10⁻¹⁶ at every weight. Written as a weight and sketched along with everything else, it holds at 8.769·10⁻⁹ at τ = 10⁸ — and the slope is the finding: the violation falls as 1/τ, one power, where the unsketched weighted problem's falls as 1/τ². The sketch costs exactly half the decades the weight was buying, and buying them back means squaring τ, which the previous figure says the arithmetic stops allowing.
l: 16
The arguments are the ones The half of a problem a sketch may touch passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
Sketching reduces a least-squares problem to 16 rows and keeps its minimiser within (1 + ε) of the original's. That is a statement about a norm, and an equality constraint is a statement that a quantity is zero, which no multiplicative distortion preserves. Kept out of the sketch and imposed exactly, the constraint holds to 1.68·10⁻¹⁶ at every weight. Written as a weight and sketched along with everything else, it holds at 1.259·10⁻⁸ at τ = 10⁸ — and the slope is the finding: the violation falls as 1/τ, one power, where the unsketched weighted problem's falls as 1/τ². The sketch costs exactly half the decades the weight was buying, and buying them back means squaring τ, which the previous figure says the arithmetic stops allowing.
l: 4
The arguments are the ones The half of a problem a sketch may touch passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
Sketching reduces a least-squares problem to 4 rows and keeps its minimiser within (1 + ε) of the original's. That is a statement about a norm, and an equality constraint is a statement that a quantity is zero, which no multiplicative distortion preserves. Kept out of the sketch and imposed exactly, the constraint holds to 4.76·10⁻¹⁶ at every weight. Written as a weight and sketched along with everything else, it holds at 5.254·10⁻⁸ at τ = 10⁸ — and the slope is the finding: the violation falls as 1/τ, one power, where the unsketched weighted problem's falls as 1/τ². The sketch costs exactly half the decades the weight was buying, and buying them back means squaring τ, which the previous figure says the arithmetic stops allowing.
l: 6
The arguments are the ones The half of a problem a sketch may touch passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.
Sketching reduces a least-squares problem to 6 rows and keeps its minimiser within (1 + ε) of the original's. That is a statement about a norm, and an equality constraint is a statement that a quantity is zero, which no multiplicative distortion preserves. Kept out of the sketch and imposed exactly, the constraint holds to 1.68·10⁻¹⁶ at every weight. Written as a weight and sketched along with everything else, it holds at 1.841·10⁻⁸ at τ = 10⁸ — and the slope is the finding: the violation falls as 1/τ, one power, where the unsketched weighted problem's falls as 1/τ². The sketch costs exactly half the decades the weight was buying, and buying them back means squaring τ, which the previous figure says the arithmetic stops allowing.
What it checked while drawing
Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed
would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave
no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had
checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected
by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of
what it is believed to check.
10 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.
a finite double, since an infinity is not a rational
a method this file implements
a problem with more data than unknowns and fewer constraints
a row order this file implements
a sketch size the problem can be reduced to
a trial count the figure can afford
and the unsketched one by two
the optimality conditions have a solution
the sketched violation falls by one power of τ
while a constraint kept out of the sketch is satisfied to rounding
Against the rule
It draws a decomposition and prints its residual. It calls
weightedFeasibility, sketchedLse,
and every figure above carries the badge — which residualcheck verifies by looking
for it in the emitted SVG rather than by finding the call that builds one. A badge that is
constructed and then left out of the body is the failure that check exists for.
Across the library: the rule bites on 217
of 397 generators —
199 print a residual and
18 are exempt with a published reason;
180 factorise nothing.
Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from,
and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.