Generator

What one weighted Jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 0.67

One function in the multigrid library, called 8 times across 2 essays. Below: what it draws at its defaults, what it draws at every value an essay asks for, the 14 claims it put to the test while drawing them, and where it stands against the rule this site is named for.

At its defaults it draws what one weighted jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 0.67. A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.

smoothing-spectrum is one function in lib/figures/multigrid.js — multigrid — the smoother, the coarse grid, and the rate that does not move. Everything below came out of it during this build, at arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.

At its defaults

Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.

What one weighted Jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 0.67A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.00.250.50.751-1-0.500.51mode frequency θ / πdamping factor per sweeppredictedmeasured±0.333a coarse grid seestwo routes to one factorsmoothing factor, scanned0.33smoothing factor, closed form0.33worst mode disagreement3.3·10⁻¹⁶63 interior points, one sweepthe left-hand end is what the coarse grid is for

A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.

omega: 0.5

The arguments are the ones A smoother that stops being one passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

What one weighted Jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 0.50A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.00.250.50.751-1-0.500.51mode frequency θ / πdamping factor per sweeppredictedmeasured±0.500a coarse grid seestwo routes to one factorsmoothing factor, scanned0.5smoothing factor, closed form0.5worst mode disagreement4.4·10⁻¹⁶63 interior points, one sweepthe left-hand end is what the coarse grid is for

A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.

omega: 0.6667

The arguments are the ones The error smoothing cannot reach passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

What one weighted Jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 0.67A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.00.250.50.751-1-0.500.51mode frequency θ / πdamping factor per sweeppredictedmeasured±0.333a coarse grid seestwo routes to one factorsmoothing factor, scanned0.33smoothing factor, closed form0.33worst mode disagreement4.4·10⁻¹⁶63 interior points, one sweepthe left-hand end is what the coarse grid is for

A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.

omega: 1

The arguments are the ones The error smoothing cannot reach passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

What one weighted Jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 1.00A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.00.250.50.751-1-0.500.51mode frequency θ / πdamping factor per sweeppredictedmeasured±1.000a coarse grid seestwo routes to one factorsmoothing factor, scanned1smoothing factor, closed form1worst mode disagreement4.4·10⁻¹⁶63 interior points, one sweepthe left-hand end is what the coarse grid is for

A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.

omega: 0.3

The arguments are the ones The error smoothing cannot reach passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

What one weighted Jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 0.30A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.00.250.50.751-1-0.500.51mode frequency θ / πdamping factor per sweeppredictedmeasured±0.700a coarse grid seestwo routes to one factorsmoothing factor, scanned0.7smoothing factor, closed form0.7worst mode disagreement3.3·10⁻¹⁶63 interior points, one sweepthe left-hand end is what the coarse grid is for

A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.

omega: 0.8

The arguments are the ones The error smoothing cannot reach passes. A value nobody placed would be a picture no essay asked for and no claim was ever checked against.

What one weighted Jacobi sweep does to each mode, at ω = 0.80A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.00.250.50.751-1-0.500.51mode frequency θ / πdamping factor per sweeppredictedmeasured±0.600a coarse grid seestwo routes to one factorsmoothing factor, scanned0.6smoothing factor, closed form0.6worst mode disagreement4.4·10⁻¹⁶63 interior points, one sweepthe left-hand end is what the coarse grid is for

A curve of the damping factor against mode frequency, falling from one at the left through zero and towards minus one at the right. The right-hand half of the plot is shaded, and two horizontal lines mark the worst damping inside it.

What it checked while drawing

Every figure above checked its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed would have stopped the picture rather than shipped a wrong one. Those checks used to leave no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of what it is believed to check.

14 distinct claims across 6 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.

mode 1 is damped by the factor its frequency predicts agree — checked 12 times

the smoothest mode survives whatever ω is

the smoothing factor, scanned and in closed form agree

Against the rule

The rule does not apply to it. It factorises nothing, so there is no residual it could be withholding. That is worth stating rather than leaving blank: a site that reported the rule as satisfied by every generator would be counting mostly generators the rule never reached.

Across the library: the rule bites on 217 of 397 generators — 199 print a residual and 18 are exempt with a published reason; 180 factorise nothing. Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from, and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.

Where it is called

Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.

The whole library · All essays · What must fail