szego-approach
At its defaults it draws κ of the ρ = 0.8 toeplitz family, against the limit it never reaches. The condition number of the n×n section of the Kac–Murdock–Szegő matrix ρ^|i−j| at ρ = 0.8, plotted against the size on logarithmic axes, with Szegő's asymptotic value ((1+ρ)/(1−ρ))² = 81 drawn as a horizontal line. The measured curve climbs towards it from below and reaches 98.9% of it at n = 128.
szego-approach is one function in lib/figures/structure.js —
structure — the matrix that is one row, and the solver that cannot see it. Everything below came out of it during this build, at
arguments taken from the essays rather than invented for this page. A figure here is the
figure a reader meets in an essay, and if the generator changes, this page changes with it.
At its defaults
Drawn even though every essay passes arguments — which on this site is every essay, at 100% of placements since the standard pass. A default nothing exercises is a trap for the next essay to call this with none, and this is the page where a default that has drifted from the figures around it becomes visible.
The condition number of the n×n section of the Kac–Murdock–Szegő matrix ρ^|i−j| at ρ = 0.8, plotted against the size on logarithmic axes, with Szegő's asymptotic value ((1+ρ)/(1−ρ))² = 81 drawn as a horizontal line. The measured curve climbs towards it from below and reaches 98.9% of it at n = 128.
rho: 0.8
The arguments are the ones A limit the matrix never reaches passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The condition number of the n×n section of the Kac–Murdock–Szegő matrix ρ^|i−j| at ρ = 0.8, plotted against the size on logarithmic axes, with Szegő's asymptotic value ((1+ρ)/(1−ρ))² = 81 drawn as a horizontal line. The measured curve climbs towards it from below and reaches 98.9% of it at n = 128.
rho: 0.95
The arguments are the ones A limit the matrix never reaches passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The condition number of the n×n section of the Kac–Murdock–Szegő matrix ρ^|i−j| at ρ = 0.95, plotted against the size on logarithmic axes, with Szegő's asymptotic value ((1+ρ)/(1−ρ))² = 1521 drawn as a horizontal line. The measured curve climbs towards it from below and reaches 87.9% of it at n = 128.
rho: 0.5
The arguments are the ones A preconditioner that changes sign passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The condition number of the n×n section of the Kac–Murdock–Szegő matrix ρ^|i−j| at ρ = 0.5, plotted against the size on logarithmic axes, with Szegő's asymptotic value ((1+ρ)/(1−ρ))² = 9 drawn as a horizontal line. The measured curve climbs towards it from below and reaches 99.9% of it at n = 128.
rho: 0.9
The arguments are the ones A preconditioner that changes sign passes. A value drawn at the generator's defaults instead would be a picture no essay asked for and no assertion has been run against.
The condition number of the n×n section of the Kac–Murdock–Szegő matrix ρ^|i−j| at ρ = 0.9, plotted against the size on logarithmic axes, with Szegő's asymptotic value ((1+ρ)/(1−ρ))² = 361 drawn as a horizontal line. The measured curve climbs towards it from below and reaches 96.0% of it at n = 128.
What it checked while drawing
Every figure above asserted its own claims on the way to being drawn, and a claim that failed
would have failed the build rather than drawn a wrong picture. Those assertions used to leave
no trace at all: a passing one returned true and the only evidence the figure had
checked anything was that nothing crashed. The list below is what they actually said, collected
by running this generator with an observer installed — not a description of
what it is believed to check.
14 distinct claims across 5 sets of arguments, grouped below by shape — because most of them are one sentence with a different number in it, and how many separate times that sentence was put to the test is the informative part.
and climbs towards it at n = 4 — asserted 6 times
κ at n = 4 is under Szegő's limit — asserted 6 times
a correlation inside the range the limit is finite over
and never arrives
Against the rule
The rule does not apply to it. It factorises nothing, so there is no residual it could be withholding. That is worth stating rather than leaving blank: a site that reported the rule as satisfied by every generator would be counting mostly generators the rule never reached.
Across the library: the rule bites on 52
of 99 generators —
37 print a residual and
15 are exempt with a published reason;
47 factorise nothing.
Read from lib/residual-rule.js, which is the same body the gate enforces from,
and the gate's last check fails the build if this page and it disagree about any generator.
Where it is called
Changing this generator changes every figure on this list. That is what makes the list worth publishing rather than keeping in a check script.
A limit the matrix never reaches
Szegő's theorem gives a Toeplitz family's condition number in closed form — ((1+ρ)/(1−ρ))², which is 81 at ρ = 0.8. The 8×8 section reaches 52% of it, the 128×128 reaches 98.9%, and none of them ever arrives. A statement about a family is not a statement about the matrix in front of you.
Structure, and the solver that cannot see itA preconditioner that changes sign
Strang's circulant preconditioner takes Toeplitz conjugate gradients from 179 steps to 10 at n = 256. At n = 64 on the same family it takes 66 steps to 109 — worse than doing nothing. Between those rows the preconditioner's smallest eigenvalue crosses zero, and nothing in the published account of the method mentions that it can be negative.
Structure, and the solver that cannot see itThe matrix that is one row
A circulant of size 16 is sixteen numbers, has no zero entry anywhere, and hands over its entire spectrum in closed form — the discrete Fourier transform of its first column, exactly. An eigensolver spends a sweep of Jacobi rotations over 256 entries arriving at the same answer, and agrees to 1.2·10⁻¹⁵.