Condition estimation — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as counterexample, lower bound — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
An estimate that can be fooled
Nobody computes a condition number, because forming an inverse costs more than the solve did. Every library estimates it instead, from four or five products with a factorisation already in hand. The estimate is exactly right on four random matrices out of five — and there is a matrix, three distinct entries wide, on which it returns a twentieth of the truth.
The cheap rank and what it cannot see
Almost nobody computes singular values to decide a rank. The standard substitute is QR with column pivoting, read off the diagonal of R — and there is a triangular matrix on which the greedy rule makes no interchange at all, has no better column available at any step, and reports a matrix eight orders of magnitude further from singular than it is.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
CounterexampleLower boundColumn pivotingCondition numberHilbert matrixHouseholder reflectionKahan's matrixLU factorisationMatrix normNumerical rankQR factorisationRank-revealing QR