Inverse iteration — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
A backward-stable answer to a problem nobody asked
One quadratic eigenvalue problem, in nine systems of units, with a change of variable that is exact in both directions. The residual the solver prints stays at the rounding level at every stop. The answer loses eleven orders of magnitude, and the two facts are consistent.
A curvature direction the factors cannot refine
A direction of negative curvature read from Bunch–Kaufman's factors held 7·10⁻¹⁶ of the curvature that was there, and the bounded rule's held 14 per cent. The prediction was that a few steps of inverse iteration with the same factors would recover it from either. One step leaves both under a thousandth, and two put both on positive curvature, at the eigenvalue nearest zero — because a solve amplifies the smallest eigenvalue in magnitude, not the most negative. What recovers the curvature is the matrix, not its factors: Lanczos from either direction reaches ninety-nine per cent in six to nine products at every coupling, and power iteration from Bunch–Kaufman's direction has not reached a tenth after sixty.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Backward errorBunch–KaufmanCondition numberExact ground truthForward errorLanczos algorithmLDLᵀ factorisationLinearisationMatrix polynomialNegative curvatureQuadratic eigenvalue problemRayleigh quotient