Galerkin projection — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Also named here as numerical range — the same set of essays touches all of them, so they are one junction rather than several.
Half the conditions and a certificate
A two-sided interpolatory reduction of a stable convection–diffusion system came back unstable at four placements of nineteen. The one-sided reduction built from the same kind of solves came back stable at all 152 placements measured across eight Péclet numbers, and not by luck: every pole of a Galerkin model lies inside the numerical range of the operator, whose edge here is exactly the diffusion term's largest eigenvalue, −0.986 at Péclet 10. The price is the slope conditions, and spent as six one-sided shifts instead of three two-sided ones it beats the stable two-sided model at seven placements of ten.
A certificate written in coordinates
Every one-sided reduced model of the convection–diffusion system was stable, because its poles cannot leave the numerical range and the range sat in the left half plane. Rescale the state by a diagonal matrix and nothing about the system changes — not its eigenvalues, not its transfer function, not one pole of any two-sided model — but the numerical range moves. At Péclet 40 a rescaling with condition number 260 pushes its edge to +6.6 and ten placements of nineteen return unstable one-sided models. Projecting in the inner product of a Lyapunov solution puts the certificate back in any coordinates.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Convection diffusionNon-normalityNumerical rangePetrov–GalerkinReduced stabilityTransfer functionBalanced truncationLyapunov equationMoment matchingRational krylovSimilarity transformation