Static pivoting — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The order that was right last time
A pivot order computed once and reused across a sequence saves the symbolic phase, and the price is that a pivot which was large may now be small. Replacing it with √u·‖A‖ costs eight orders of backward error and iterative refinement recovers a factor of 8.8 of them. Divide each row by its largest entry first and the same reuse costs nothing at all.
An ordering that does not wait for the numbers
A sparse factorisation's memory is decided by an ordering computed from the graph, and its stability by pivots computed from the values, and the two decisions fight. On one family of matrices they do not — the ordering can be chosen for fill alone, and the fill the symbolic phase predicts is the fill the factorisation produces — exactly, not as a bound.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Fill-inGrowth factorSymbolic factorisationBackward errorElimination treeEquilibrationIterative refinementLDLᵀ factorisationMinimum degreeQuasi definite matrixSaddle-point systemsSparse lu